Real Estate news

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • yuri
    replied
    I changed it to link to the Github latest release.

    Leave a comment:


  • goodwill
    replied
    The button in https://www.espocrm.com/extensions/real-estate/ doesn't download the latest version it will link to 1.6.3

    Click image for larger version

Name:	image.png
Views:	156
Size:	41.7 KB
ID:	101063

    Leave a comment:


  • yuri
    replied
    I added the fix to the new release https://github.com/espocrm/ext-real-...ases/tag/1.6.3. Little different as using strings "recordAccount..." is a legacy way.

    Leave a comment:


  • hamster
    replied
    THANK YOU! Works like a charm and should find its way into the next release of the repo of the extension. This small line makes the RealEstate extension WAY more powerfull.

    Going to test some details the next days and getting back with a report next WE.

    Leave a comment:


  • rabii
    replied
    i have checked and it seems that property has only two permissions therefore you need to customise it, here is what you need to do:

    1 - Create a new file under custom\Espo\Custom\Resources\metadata\scopes\RealE stateProperty.json (if the folders don;t exist create them) and use the code below:

    PHP Code:
    {
        "aclPortal": "recordAllAccountContactOwnNo"
    }
    This will overwrite the existing permission and will allow you to set the permission of the property to All - Account - Contact - Own - No (don't forget to clear cache and rebuild the system) after that the portal user should be able to access the properties based on what you assigned to them as a permission if account (then they will have access to all properties related to their account ) if contact then they will see only properties related to them as a contact.

    Hope this helps

    Leave a comment:


  • hamster
    replied
    ​Does not work, as you only have 3 choices to set persions: all, own or none

    Click image for larger version  Name:	grafik.png Views:	0 Size:	4.3 KB ID:	94501

    Usually you have 4 options: all, account, contact, none
    Click image for larger version

Name:	grafik.png
Views:	164
Size:	4.5 KB
ID:	94503

    Leave a comment:


  • rabii
    commented on 's reply
    I think you can achieve this (making a property visible to the contacts added to it) by using roles and permissions. contacts should be converted to portals and then in their role set (view property : contact) so this way a contact can view only properties they are related to.

  • hamster
    replied
    The property extension has a lot of potential. I think it is mainly made for small real estate sellers, but it can be also used for real estate manager, to give customers a self service plattform and a ticket system. I am customizing (adding fields and relationships) things in my spartime at the moment, so it will fit my needs. Unfortunatly I dont have any programming skills (php, java etc).

    I hope, making a property visible to the contacts added to it, is not too complicated. Such a feature would be awesome. What would such a feature cost as a one time payment, if the module will stay free?

    Personally i would be fine with a paid version but some people might be not (see espcrm ). I guess a lot of users are just self employed or very small companies with low budget.

    Leave a comment:


  • yuri
    commented on 's reply
    It may become an abandonware otherwise.

  • esforim
    commented on 's reply
    Please no!

  • yuri
    replied
    We will take a look when get a chance.

    The issue with Real Estate extension that it's free and we don't know how many companies in the world use it. The userbase also has small overlap with Advanced Pack userbase. Maybe it would be better to make the extension paid so that we could invest more resources into maintaining and development.

    Leave a comment:


  • hamster
    replied
    The RealEstate extension is just love. I only have issues to give portal users access to a property by connecting the property with a contact or an account (multiple users are added towards a property). The property will not show up in the portal. With a lot trial and error i figured the following:

    To make a property visible for a portal user, he either needs rights to read ALL properties (wich is a no-go) or he must create a property on his own. Unfortunetaly only the portal user who created the property is able to see the property in the portal.

    Am I missing something or is there any way to get it working the way I discribed in the second sentence?

    Leave a comment:


  • esforim
    replied
    Originally posted by Maximus
    Hi,
    The Real Estate extension is an open-source extension so for it, you can make a fork from the GitHub repo https://github.com/espocrm/ext-real-estate, translate it and make a pull request to apply your translation.
    We don't have a public source to let the community translate our paid extensions.
    So for them, you can follow this way https://docs.espocrm.com/development/translation/ to build the translation file. The translation can be provided to our team for implementation.
    Hi Maximus, isn't Real Estate part of the Free Extensions? So I guess you mean, "no community translate for our official extensions".

    It look like yuri just upload the German file anyhow.

    Leave a comment:


  • yuri
    replied
    I've attached a po file for German language. If you translate it we will apply it to the repository.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Maximus
    replied
    Hi,
    The Real Estate extension is an open-source extension so for it, you can make a fork from the GitHub repo https://github.com/espocrm/ext-real-estate, translate it and make a pull request to apply your translation.
    We don't have a public source to let the community translate our paid extensions.
    So for them, you can follow this way https://docs.espocrm.com/development/translation/ to build the translation file. The translation can be provided to our team for implementation.

    Leave a comment:

Working...