Hello,
"normally" I use the field "name" as 1. column in my view list.
With a formula I have created a content for field "name" here: name = string\concatenate(anrede, ‘ ‘ , titel, ‘ ‘, lastName, ‘ ‘, firstName);
I checked the content via a DB-Manager - it's ok.
In Layouts I declaired the field "name" as 1. column.
In administration - settings - local settings in the box format of name for persons I can't chose "name" only variants of first_name and last_name and also not let it empty.
So in my view list of persons it shows the set of local-settings from settings - it seems, that the field "name" was (output)-overwritten by the definition of local-settings.
Is this a bug or by design? Why? Has to do with the following workflows that depends on this setting? Has to do with: email, contact and meetings are separate entitiest ... and their workflows?
How can I change this? (OK - I could design a new entity with type "base", or I can create a new field which I can use for 1. column ...)
Christoph
"normally" I use the field "name" as 1. column in my view list.
With a formula I have created a content for field "name" here: name = string\concatenate(anrede, ‘ ‘ , titel, ‘ ‘, lastName, ‘ ‘, firstName);
I checked the content via a DB-Manager - it's ok.
In Layouts I declaired the field "name" as 1. column.
In administration - settings - local settings in the box format of name for persons I can't chose "name" only variants of first_name and last_name and also not let it empty.
So in my view list of persons it shows the set of local-settings from settings - it seems, that the field "name" was (output)-overwritten by the definition of local-settings.
Is this a bug or by design? Why? Has to do with the following workflows that depends on this setting? Has to do with: email, contact and meetings are separate entitiest ... and their workflows?
How can I change this? (OK - I could design a new entity with type "base", or I can create a new field which I can use for 1. column ...)
Christoph
Comment