Display Related Records in Detail View

[Stefan]

Hi guys!

Following initial situation:
Entity A 1:n Entity B

Is it possible to display all other B related to A in detail view of B?

I tried it with reportpanel, but unfortunately that didn't work.

[shalmaxb]

The relationships creates field for both sides, which you the may use to display, for example all record of B, that are related to A and vice versa. Possible with default tools.

[Stefan]

@shalmaxb: Thanks for your answer!

But the relationship is betwenn A and B, and not B and B. Or am I missing something?

And i want to display all B (with same A) in B. (I hope that is understandable).

[shalmaxb]

you can create whatever relationship you want, between A and B (which is automatically also between B and A), between B and B or A and A. Who never worked with relationships before needs to experiment and learn a bit. But once you get it, it is a marvellous functionality in espoCRM.

[Stefan]

I think we're talking past each other a little. I am well aware of how relationships work.

As written, I have a 1:n relationship between A and B.

So for example:
A1 -- B1
A1 -- B2
A1 -- B3
A2 -- B4

Now the question is whether I can display the other Bs related to A1 (B2, B3) in B1 without creating a separate relationship between Bs, as there is actually already a relationship via A1.

[shalmaxb]

ok, I see. I think, this is not possible with espoCRM alone. I have this kind of relationship, which involves a middle entity realised with the extension Link Multiple by Eblasoft (excellent extnsion by the way). With that extension it is possible to create a middle entity and connect entity A with B1, B2 and so forth.

[Stefan]

I was actually hoping that this would work with the Advanced Pack and the ReportPanels ...

I also have Link Multiple by Eblasoft. However, as far as I know, I would have to create a new middle entity for this and could not use the existing relationships. Right?

[shalmaxb]

you can read here how it works: https://www.eblasoft.com.tr/post/lin...o-many-to-many

[Stefan]

Thank you for your input shalmaxb, but I think that's is not a suitable solution to my problem.

If anyone has a solution to my problem I would be very grateful.