Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

When referencing the Account from a Contact in reports it picks the wrong one.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • When referencing the Account from a Contact in reports it picks the wrong one.

    Hi, I have a report which works against Contacts.

    This report has a filter that references the Account.Type

    On a specific Contact there are two parent Accounts, one Active and one Inactive. When I use the Account.Type filter, it looks at the Inactive Account rather than the Active account.

    I appreciate that if there are multiple Accounts then the filter could be ambiguous, but it should ignore Inactive accounts.

    Here are some screen snips.

    First the Contact ref:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Account.png
Views:	177
Size:	5.4 KB
ID:	66352

    There are only 2 linked Accounts, "EY ZW" (Inactive) and "Cassava Smartech" (Active).

    On each account there is a "Status" that relates to the Account.

    This is filtered in the report here:
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Account Type.png
Views:	142
Size:	2.9 KB
ID:	66354

    In my example Cassava is a Customer and "EY ZW" isn't.

    When I run the report I am expecting the Contact to be picked because the Active Account is a Customer. It is not being selected.

    Thanks
    Attached Files

  • #2
    Unfortunately, the report functionality doesn't know about account being inactive or active. I suggest that you set the active account as a primary for the contact. You have inactive account set as primary.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ah, so the link is to the Primary account; that makes sense.

      I see that primary is indicated in a different way to what you do elsewhere in the system (say primary phone number or primary email), could I suggest that you standardise this so that others don't make the same mistake. It has taken me a long time to track down why there are the wrong number of items on the report.

      Comment


      • #4
        That's because there was no enough space to fit the button there.

        Comment

        Working...
        X